Wednesday, December 17, 2003
J. R. R. Tolkien, Enemy of Progress
In honor of the Return of the King, two links today. Reader The Other Joey calls our attention to this piece from SF author David Brin on Salon from 2002. TOJ comments, “Basically, the article takes the side of Sauron, insisting that the story of The Lord of the Rings is elitist, anti-progressive, anti-industrial, pro-aristocratic, and oversimplifying in terms of what is ‘good’ and what is ‘evil.’ The article considers LOTR to be primarily a work of anti-scientific, anti-democratic romanticism, against the modernity that supposedly would destroy beauty and tradition. . . . Long live Sauron, defender of the proletariat!” (Well, this should balance the von Mises piece the other day. Talk about oversimplifying.) Worth thought if you haven’t seen it yet, and it does call us to critical engagement with our entertainment. Were there time, I would argue Brin makes his own false dichotomies and has a fundamental misreading of Tolkien, tradition, and fantasy as a whole. But SF writer Gene Wolfe has read Tolkien more and better than Brin, so I’ll let him argue for me in “The Best Introduction to the Mountains.”
Just so you guys know, that “Long live Sauron” comment was a joke. I didn’t expect you’d actually post that part up here.