Friday, May 09, 2003
bake your noodle. Daniel 5:15

Daniel 05:15

Interpretation: It’s a Matter of Life and Death

Belshazzar, son of Nebuchadnezzar, learns a lesson about the interpretation of signs.

Comments

1

Mene, Mene, Tekel, Whatsyourpoint? Do we need Daniel to interpret what this article has to do with the Matrix?

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 12 May 03 at 11:16 AM
2

Aw, c’mon! If this is the best you can do, I’m likely to give you a sign with an embodied finger you’re very likely to understand.

Posted by .(JavaScript must be enabled to view this email address) on 20 May 03 at 04:22 PM
3

Easy there, Mr. Frisbie!  The piece you’re replying to is the “Teaser” piece for Metaphilm’s interpretation of Reloaded.  The “actual” piece, titled “Reloaded Decoded” has NOT BEEN POSTED YET.

Hang in there, Matrix fans.  The answers are coming.

Posted by publisher on 20 May 03 at 05:09 PM
4

The Daniel Institute in Enter the Matrix?  The symbols used in Daniel (OT) are repeated in Revelation (NT), and so it’s sometimes assumed that both (groups of) authors were of the same thought-world (i.e. Merkabah mystics): and they explain WHAT the son of Man really is… which could be part of Revolutions?   

Posted by wertham on 21 May 03 at 10:13 PM
5

I agree with Kilgore. What does the story have to do with the movie? If Morpheus’ ship was name Belshazzar then it would have been a clue to his disastrous misinterpretation of the Oracle’s prophecy. But as the ship is named Nebuchadnezzar, the story’s ominous lesson doesn’t directly apply. If the ship’s name is any indication of the future, maybe Morpheus will suprise everyone in Revolutions by going insane on all fours and eating grass like cattle.

Posted by Hadrian on 10 Jun 03 at 06:45 PM
6

Reloaded Decoded is now officially interpreted at:
http://www.metaphilm.com/philm.php?id=144_0_2_0_M

Posted by publisher on 29 Jun 03 at 08:11 PM

Post a Comment

Name:

Email:

Location:

URL:

Remember my personal information

Notify me of follow-up comments?