Monday, November 17, 2003
Matrix Revolutions, The Corporate Mofo Guide
Ken Mondschein is back with an amusing and generally helpful exegesis of Matrix 3. Something to do with Plato vs. the Nominalists. “Just as Trinity couldn’t have survived the final encounter, neither could Neo. (What kind of life could they have, anyway? They’re archetypes, not characters. What would they do, raise a bunch of clichés?)” Seems like a lot of this stuff got deconstructed a few centuries ago. The problem with ignoring historical philosophy and theology is that you have to go through the same tired theories over and over again. But then, it’s all too easy to see only what you want to see.
why are the major metphilm players so afraid of this movie? why the constant slighting and ridiculously overrought cynicism? i mean come on. so you didn’t like it. get over it and move on. you’ve already accused the films of being cia-style mind control, nazi lizardmen propoganda that will enslave us all into...what? well that’s not ever clear in any of the ten thousand matrix articles on here, but then fearmongerers aren’t about presenting evidence, let alone solutions to problems.
“but then, it’s all too easy to see only what you want to see.”
exactly right. but not like the metaphilm staff writers who know evil when they see it! right?
please.
look i don’t mean to be rude. i just want my old metaphilm back. one that’s intelligent and thought-provoking, instead of irrational and inflamatory. if that means never ever mentioning the matrix again, i can’t say i’d complain.